by Dylan Williams
This article is not meant to convince you of the merits of RFID-blocking wallets and underground bunkers. We all read the security breach headlines, pray for litigation costs to reach a ceiling, and watch executives escorted from their headquarters for unethical conduct.
Let’s talk about information in practical terms.  Every organisation deals with some level of uncertainty with respect to their information — the accuracy of quarterly projections, the introduction of previously unknown technologies, the impact of generational shifts in the workforce.
The question is how to leverage the knowledge from things we can and should measure to proactively address blind spots.  Let’s explore these potential uncertainties, how they can affect your organisation, and the measures that you can take to address them before they become major issues.
Organisations need compliance to deal with much of their business information, but often fall short of making effective use of that information to respond to challenges that don’t easily present themselves on a balance sheet or operating report.

Big uncertainty, big problems

But before we get into compliance, I want to discuss briefly what I call the 5 I’s of Big Uncertainty. Uncertainty is “big” because information is “big,” and getting bigger every day.
The massive volume of unstructured information has shifted the calculus. Today, the biggest risk exists in areas that are not measured, analyzed or managed — the more ambiguous the information, the greater the risk it presents to your organisation.  And yet, so many resources are dedicated to refining fractions of a percentage of known metrics. I would argue that while “big data” gets all the attention, addressing “big uncertainty” is a far better indicator of an organisation’s ability to innovate sustainably.
Managing this uncertainty is at the heart of governance, risk and compliance, and can be broken into these 5 I’s of Big Uncertainty:

1. Inconsistent

The uncertainty with the least impact on your organisation, this generally deals with deterministic concerns. Variables can lead to inconsistency in the information you have coming into your organisation. This can have a ripple effect throughout your organisation and lead to poor decision-making.

2. Inaccurate

The next level of impact comes from inaccurate information — often caused by poor measurement methods or wrong decisions about which information to collect. This is potentially more harmful than inconsistent information, as inaccuracies are often more difficult to identify and change.

3. Inconclusive

Leaders are often paid to make business decisions without having all the information in front of them. But if that information is incomplete and inconclusive, it could cause decision-makers to make choices they would not otherwise make, or delay and prevent decisions entirely.

4. Intangible

Even more dangerous than inconclusive information is intangible information — info that doesn’t present itself on a balance sheet or operating report. This can be anything from brand perception to information about inner workings at your facilities (e.g., why production at one of your manufacturing plants is behind schedule). The danger is in the perception that this information can’t or shouldn’t be measured.

5. Invisible

This represents the classic “don’t know what you don’t know.” The unexpected nature of this information makes it also potentially the most dangerous.
Of these 5 I’s, the two most common compliance concerns are:  inaccurate and inconsistent information.

Finding additional value in compliance

Compliance deals with rules and exacting measurements. While globalization and a steadily shifting legal landscape are creating numerous compliance hassles and headaches, there are usually clear objectives and measurement tactics in place to follow existing rules, so – generally speaking – if an organisation follows the rules, it should be in compliance.

But it isn’t always that easy.

In my experience, many organisations tend to focus extraordinary resources towards information decisions around potentially inconsistent or inaccurate data informing business forecasts, market research or budgets. These numbers are continually refined to make them more precise as more information comes in.

This is where many organisations stop, however — a mistake in my view.

These organisations are missing out on the value of the learnings and metrics generated from their compliance activities, which can better inform decisions around information higher up the pyramid — inconclusive, intangible or even invisible. As an example of this, consider your accounts payable team.
Every business has bills and taxes to pay and their own methods of doing so. Organisations that process hardcopy invoices find that this work takes longer and that errors can create significantly larger bottlenecks than typically seen with electronic invoicing, which is more automated, accurate and more easily integrated with other systems in your organisation.
Shifting to electronic invoicing also makes sense from a compliance perspective and allows organisations to attain early payment discounts and more accurately report regulated financials. But while many organisations stop here, information leaders take steps to leverage additional value.
If the entire procurement-to-payment process can be conducted in near real-time, it frees up workers to spend less time matching vendor numbers and manually keying data from paper invoices.  This allows them more time looking for trends in purchasing habits, shipping times, vendor service level compliance and so on. This information can then be used to inform decisions around information that was either previously inconclusive (lacking analytics), or intangible (e.g., what’s causing one branch to outperform another?). That’s why compliance addresses the foundation of the uncertainty pyramid — these issues are often at the heart of your business challenges.
Organisations need compliance to deal with much of their business information, but often fall short of making effective use of that information to respond to challenges that don’t easily present themselves on a balance sheet or operating report. With the flood of information flowing into organisations increasing, compliance should be seen as more than a basic functional requirement.  Compliance should be considered for the extended value it can bring an organisation.

Ready to become a change maker and explore the extended value compliance can bring to your organisation?  Visit RicohChangeMakers today!