Everyone knows that practicing sustainability gives your business brownie points.But changing your operating systems and going green can be disruptive, costing you time and money. From a financial standpoint, is sustainability worth the effort?

The answer is a resounding yes—if you think in terms of long-term profits rather than tomorrow’s balance sheet. When you do that, the benefits are eye-opening.

Researchers for Project ROI1, a report developed by IO Consulting and Babson College with sponsors Verizon and Campbell Soup, combed through over 200 studies and found that corporate responsibility and sustainable practices can increase the market value of a company by up to 6 percent over a 15-year period. For companies that do business with NGOs or environmentally-friendly organizations, the figures are even more dramatic—their market value can exceed that of less-sustainable competitors by 40 to 80 percent.

The report also said that socially responsible companies can reduce their credit spread by 40 percent and reduce share price volatility by 2 to 10 percent.

A record of sustainability allows you to sell products at a premium and increase sales revenue by up to 20 percent. It strengthens brand loyalty by up to 60 percent and increases a company’s reputational value by 7 to 11 percent, the report said.

There’s a workforce case for sustainability, too. Staff turnover is 25 to 50 percent lower in companies that demonstrate corporate responsibility, saving you money on hiring costs, Project ROI found. And if you incorporate green building techniques to provide workers with fresher air and more light, they will be 8 to 11 percent more productive, according to a World Green Building Council report2.

Going green pays off

A chief criticism of green building is its up-front costs. But over time, building green—or retrofitting existing buildings to be green—reduces operating costs, sometimes dramatically. Green buildings consume an average of 25 percent less energy and 11 percent less water than others, in addition to emitting 34 percent less greenhouse gases. As a result, they save 19 percent in maintenance costs, the U.S. Green Building Council says. Over time, energy savings accumulate—and so do the dollars in your wallet. According to a Department of Energy official,Energy Star-rated commercial buildings typically use 10 to 40 percent less energy than unrated buildings. Because of this, payback on green building projects can happen in as little as two to five years, and owners often can sell the property at a 6 to 10 percent premium.

If you can’t implement a large-scale program, even making a small change in energy efficiency can go a long way. An analysis4  of 30,000 commercial buildings in New York found that changing the temperature by just one degree could collectively save $145 million, or about 2 percent of the energy across all the buildings. Replacing old, inefficient windows could save $227 million, or about 4.5 percent of total energy costs.

Most commercial building owners borrow money to make energy-saving adjustments, and as we all know, borrowing isn’t easy with today’s tighter standards.

But green projects have an advantage—studies showthat loans for LEED-certified buildings have lower default rates, making them more attractive to lenders. Fannie Mae now lowers interest rates by 10 basis points for people who build sustainable multifamily apartments.

No matter what the building type, going green brings you tax advantages.

Real examples

So who’s actually using sustainable business practices, and are they reaping tangible results?

Judge for yourself. Here are three examples:

  • In 2013, UPS6 started using an optimization system to create more efficient routes for its drivers and save on gas. For each mile eliminated, the company uses a million and a half fewer gallons of fuel a year. Collectively, that saves the company $22.5 million a year, plus reductions in service and maintenance costs. 
  • Unilever7 created a drip irrigation system for soybean farmers that saves water and reduces the need for buying pesticides. It started a factory eco-efficiency program, developing bottles with 15 percent less plastic than earlier versions, for example. The factory program saves the company over $200 million a year and has created a thousand jobs. Unilever also partnered with another company to educate consumers on saving energy when doing laundry. As a result, it received a boost in market share and a 25 percent increase in sales on its laundry products.
  • Walmart,8 not generally known for its approach to sustainability, has announced its aspiration to be supplied 100 percent by renewable energy, and is aiming to produce 7 billion kWh of renewable energy by 2020, while also reducing energy use by 20 percent. Approximately 30 MW of new solar capacity has been built to date, and will ultimately offset Walmart’s power needs by up to 30 percent—enough to power a city of more than 5 thousand people for an entire year

By: Laurie Bacon

Laurie Bacon, Principal Consultant, Business Process Agility, Enterprise Services Delivery, Ricoh USA, Inc., provides high value to customers’ businesses by assessing current challenges, developing multi-year solution roadmaps aligning with organizational objectives, ultimately helping to maximize operational efficiency and provide valuable return on investment. She has a tremendous track record of success, including driving multi-discipline projects that generated $76 million in Customer OG&A expense reduction

1 Bliss, Richard; Jordan, Stephen; Rochlin, Steve; Yaffe Kiser, Cheryl. Project ROI.
2 World Green Building Council. “Health, Wellbeing & Productivity in Offices The Next Chapter for Green Building.”
3 Weinschenk, Carl. Energy Manager Today. 2 May 2016
4 Matheson, Ray. MIT News. 16 November 2016
5 Platt, Roger.US Green Building Council. 29 September 2015
6 Murray, James. BusinessGreen. 29 April 2016
7 Lozanova, Sarah. TriplePundit. 9 June 2015
8 Walmart. Walmart’s Approach to Renewable Energy